This post should currently consider as an archive and reference of Grant Application. The original grant was submitted at around 2024-10-18.
Name of Grant:
- Vehicle tracking beacon for Feather PT3 test flight
Brief:
According to earlier discussion and the PT3 task list (PT3_task_list - Google Sheets), we’re planning to introduce a device that:
- Broadcast its current coordinates to nearby receivers at certain intervals
- Fix or stick on to the testing aircraft
Necessary due to:
- To be the last safety measure in the worst case
- To reveal the location in case of the testing aircraft get missing due to certain reason
- Uncertainty of regular cellular signal coverage in the test flight airspace
Related work:
- Incoming PT3 test flight is related
Be entirely open source:
- Yes
May involve… :
- The Engineering pod:
- One-time investment and long-term service
- The hardware may be customized programming into various uses
- The Arrow:
- Experience the decentralized wireless network
Personal and background:
@KBM Light UAV operator & Project manager (Similar EX: Very rare: Arduino UNO-R3 LED blinking by LabView or IDE)
Input from another bounty/grant:
- No
Breakdown & Date:
- 15 Days by (Struggling not included):
- Purchase, Shipping, Document collecting (3 Days)
- Hardware verify, Programming (7 Days)
- Case Modeling (2 Days)
- Field testing, Debrief (3 Days)
- Ideal range: 241020~241105
Problems to solve and goals:
- Addressing the lack of tracking beacon for the aircraft
- Learning the basic of LoRa transmission
Outcomes and due dates:
- 1 broadcaster
- 1 handheld receiver with screen
- Case models for 3D print
- Corresponding program source code
(Dates are listed above)
Applicability:
- It can be used not only for aircraft positioning, but also for positioning or transmitting small data between various assets in the field (Further research needed)
Evaluation:
- Effective range reach 6 Km in line of sight
- Battery endurance for 16 Hours
Potential risks and solutions:
- Shipment to US will be a problem
- Purchase new hardware in US if there’s no cheap shipment method from China
- This person is bad at programming and totally no experience with ESP32
- KBM will try his best to ensure that the experimental equipment won’t be scrapped
In case of unforeseen obstacles or delays:
- Self-condemnation
- Revoke the grant can be an option
Long-term support:
- Depends on requirements or critical update in-needed
Work sustainability ensure:
- Keep source code well commented will be important
- Use GPT
Hours and funding:
- 100 Hours est.
- 216 USDC
- 24 ARROW
Representing good value for Arrow:
- An insurance for the worst possible result in test flight
- On-site verification of long range P2P datalink in decentralized case
Payment schedule:
- Single
- After the debrief
How GBC verify the work:
- Place the broadcaster 2 ft above the surface, and perform range test in rural area, walking, driving or flying with receiver can achieve different effective range
- I wish we will never have to use it to acquire a lost aircraft
Alternatives or options have been considered:
- Off-the-shelf GNSS tracker based on cellular network and third-party app or server
- Or just do without a tracker, fly it wild
End Grant Application Form
Addtional custom informations (BOM / technical analysis)
Introduce:
In most scenario we use cellular network as first priority, but due to the uncertainty of cellular signal coverage in the test flight airspace, I decide to introduce a simple LoRa-APRS solution with :
BOM:
-
Broadcaster:
- ESP32 (basic platform)
- GNSS (Solve the coordinates)
- e.g. U-Blox-M10S
- e.g. U-Blox-M8N
- LoRa (Broadcast the coordinates and other required info on-air)
- SX1262 in 915Mhz
- 915Mhz SMA 3DBi antenna
-
Receiver:
- ESP32 (basic platform)
- LoRa (Decode the information from broadcast)
- Same in 915Mhz but SX1262 is still recommended
- 2 way SMA separator
- 915Mhz SMA 4DBi antenna
- 915Mhz SMA 7DBi antenna
- OLED screen (For displaying information on receiver’s portable device)
Pros and Cons
The limitations of the LoRa-APRS comparing to cellular network:
- Limited broadcast range with 4~16KM typically
- P2P broadcast
- Antenna attitude affects broadcast range
- Slightly more expensive then cellular network based trackers
The positive of the device is:
- Based on decentralized wireless network
- No third-party server connections
- NO SUBSCRIPTION
Current shopping reference for experiment in Shenzhen:
- Broadcaster:
- LILYGO® T-Beam V1.2 M8N SX1262 915Mhz (T-Beam SoftRF – LILYGO®) - 36.65 USD
- Receiver for rescue team:
- LILYGO® T-Beam SUPREME V3.0 + Core V3.0 (Ublox version) (T-Beam SUPREME – LILYGO®) - 73.53 USD (Fancy and for easier development)
- or LILYGO® T-Beam Meshtastic 915Mhz (T-Beam Meshtastic [US] – LILYGO®) - 37.30 USD (Cheaper)
- Batteries for all devices:
- EVE INR-18650-35V - 2.00 USD 2 required
- or Panasonic NCR18650B - 3.00 USD 2 required
(The above quantities can be increased according to practical needs)
More idea in-needed,please hate me again
End of post